A Look into the Future of the USA, a lesson in global social engineering.
By Glenn Smith Jr
A couple of days ago I was reading an article about President Obama and a report being delivered to the U.N Commission on Human Rights. This piqued my interest so I went on a search for the document itself. Here it is: Report of the United States of America Submitted to the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights In Conjunction with the Universal Periodic Review.
This report contains some very telling information into the thinking of the Obama Administration and its Global Socialist agenda. What was even more revealing was just how much of this agenda has been developed over the past 60 years. Mr. Obama has come to power at a very opportune time to promote his Globalist views. These views are very much in line with those of many foreign nations (friend and foe). I highly recommend taking the time to read the entire document. Since it is 29 pages in length, I will highlight some of my findings for consideration.
During the 2008 presidential campaign, I heard it said that we had to choose between a National Socialist and a Global Socialist. John McCain is a patriot and loves the USA but his record clearly shows a Socialist leaning. Barak Obama, on the other hand, is clearly a Global Socialist. His actions and dealings in the international scene have proven this to be without doubt. Now we can see just how he intends to accomplish the progression of turning the US from a free republic to a “global partner” with sharply reduced sovereignty.
Here are some excerpts from the report:
Section 1: Introduction – We present our first Universal Periodic Review (UPR) report in the context of our commitment to help to build a world in which universal rights give strength and direction to the nations, partnerships, and institutions that can usher us toward a more perfect world, a world characterized by, as President Obama has said, “a just peace based on the inherent rights and dignity of every individual.”
You will notice certain terms used throughout this report such as “universal rights” and “nations, partnerships, and institutions that can usher us toward a more perfect world”. The beginning of this report is part history lesson and part propaganda.
Another excerpt from the introduction: It is our political system that enables our economy and undergirds our global influence. As President Obama wrote in the preface to the recently published National Security Strategy, “democracy does not merely represent our better angels, it stands in opposition to aggression and injustice, and our support for universal rights is both fundamental to American leadership and a source of our strength in the world.”
Again, please note the key terms of universal rights.
One last clip from the intro: The ideas that informed and inform the American experiment can be found all over the world, and the people who have built it over centuries have come from every continent. The American experiment is a human experiment; the values on which it is based, including a commitment to human rights, are clearly engrained in our own national conscience, but they are also universal.
Here is part of section 2 discussing a governmental role: II.2 Enduring commitments
11. As we look to the future, the United States stands committed to the enduring promises of protecting individual freedoms, fairness and equality before the law, and human dignity—promises that reflect the inalienable rights of each person. Our commitment to the rights protected in our Constitution is matched by a parallel commitment to foster a society characterized by shared prosperity. Finally, we are committed to the idea that the values behind the domestic promises articulated in our Constitution should also guide and inform our engagement with the world.
The bulk of the middle section takes you on a tour of the things our government has done toward these goals over time. Much of the things listed here are discussions about voting and civil right laws passed in the last 100 years. I want to point out that not all of these things were bad or dangerous in and of themselves. As a matter of fact, much of these things were great ideas. That notwithstanding, let us continue.
Here is the Obama interpretation of things, as spelled out in section 3:
III. A commitment to freedom, equality, and dignity
12. Article 1 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights declares that “all human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights” and that they are “endowed with reason and conscience.” This basic truth suggests the kinds of obligations—both positive and negative—that governments have with regard to their citizens.
13. People should be free and should have a say in how they are governed. Governments have an obligation not to restrict fundamental freedoms unjustifiably, and governments need to create the laws and institutions that secure those freedoms.
14. People should enjoy fair treatment reflected in due process and equality before the law. Governments have an obligation not to discriminate or persecute and should establish mechanisms for protection and redress.
15. People should be treated with dignity. Governments have an obligation to protect the security of the person and to respect human dignity.
16. These obligations are what enable people to claim “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness” as their just entitlements. These same rights are encoded in international human rights law and in our own Constitution.
I find it interesting that in practice, the Obama administration ignores the concept of people having a say in how they are governed.
Another area of hypocrisy is seen in this statement: Law enforcement is one of the fundamental duties of any state. Our commitment to the inalienable rights of each person guides our efforts to ensure that our law enforcement system reflects and respects those rights.
Apparently, the DOJ hasn’t got this memo.
The next several pages go on to discuss fairness in a wide array of topics. I want to now focus on the real telling parts of this report, the sections near the end and its conclusions. It is here that we will find the heart of the matter.
This next section begins to expose the Globalist process:
A commitment to values in our engagement across borders
77. The United States understands its role as a cornerstone in an international system of cooperation to preserve global security, support the growth of global prosperity, and progress toward world peace based on respect for the human rights and dignity of every person.
78. Our own efforts to build such a world include our role as the world’s largest donor of development aid—including our commitment to disaster relief as seen recently in Haiti and Pakistan. And they include a commitment to using “smart power” in our foreign policy, 20
including a focus on honest, determined diplomacy and on harnessing the full potential of international institutions to facilitate cooperation.
The Constitution never spelled out the US role as being a cornerstone in an international system of cooperation to preserve global security. In the beginning, we were isolationist and were simply looking to deal with our own issues. Now we are a superpower with global responsibilities. Yes, we need to be a good neighbor and use our wealth and might for good, but that doesn’t mean that we are to be the central supplier of success for everyone else. If the USA was able to build to its level of success by utilizing the governmental and economic structure provided by our constitution, then so should every other country that follows this process. The issue here is that the other countries don’t want to do that. They instead are looking to siphon off that which we have built. This is what is at the heart of Global Wealth Re-Distribution.
If you need more, look at this:
80. The fundamental truth which grounds the principles of government enshrined in our Constitution—that each person is created with equal value from which flows inalienable rights—is not an exclusively American truth; it is a universal one. It is the truth that anchors the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, it is the truth that underpins the legitimate purposes and obligations not just of our government, but of all governments.
81. We are committed to that universal truth, and so we are committed to principled engagement across borders and with foreign governments and their citizens. This commitment includes, in the words of our Declaration of Independence, according “decent respect to the opinions of mankind,” and seeking always to preserve and protect the dignity of all persons, because the values that we cherish apply everywhere and to everyone.
There is nothing wrong with educating other nations with our system, but the process must stop there. Any nation that desires to have the success and prosperity of the UAS must embrace and employ the principles and structure of the USA for themselves. It is not our responsibility to do it for them.
This next section deals with immigration. I am including it in its entirety so that there can be no mistaking what is in it and what it means to the US citizens:
V.2 Values and Immigration
92. That immigrants have been consistently drawn to our shores throughout our history is both a testament to and a source of the strength and appeal of our vibrant democracy. As he left office, President Reagan remarked that the United States is “still a beacon, still a magnet for all who must have freedom, for all the pilgrims from all the lost places who are hurtling through the darkness, toward home.” Over the last 50 years, the U.S. has accepted several million refugees fleeing persecution from all corners of the globe as well as many millions of immigrants seeking a better life or joining family. Today, the United States and other countries to which a significant number of people seek to emigrate face challenges in developing and enforcing immigration laws and policies that reflect economic, social, and national security realities. In addressing these issues we seek to build a system of immigration enforcement that is both effective and fair.
93. In 2009, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) began a major overhaul of the U.S. immigration detention system in an effort to improve detention center management and prioritize health, safety, and uniformity among immigration detention facilities, while ensuring security and efficiency. As part of this effort, in conjunction with ongoing consultations with non-governmental organizations and outside experts, DHS issued revised parole guidelines, effective January 2010, for arriving aliens in expedited removal found to have a credible fear of persecution or torture. The new guidelines firmly establish that it is not in the public interest to detain those arriving aliens found to have a credible fear who establish their identities, and that they pose neither a flight risk nor a danger to the community.
94. Under section 287(g) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, DHS may delegate authority to state and local officers to enforce federal immigration law. DHS has made improvements to the 287(g) program, including implementing a new, standardized Memorandum of Agreement with state and local partners that strengthens program oversight and provides uniform guidelines for DHS supervision of state and local agency officer operations; information reporting and tracking; complaint procedures; and implementation measures. DHS continues to evaluate the program, incorporating additional safeguards as necessary to aid in the prevention of racial profiling and civil rights violations and improve accountability for protecting human rights.
95. A recent Arizona law, S.B. 1070, has generated significant attention and debate at home and around the world. The issue is being addressed in a court action that argues that the federal government has the authority to set and enforce immigration law. That action is ongoing; parts of the law are currently enjoined.
96. President Obama remains firmly committed to fixing our broken immigration system, because he recognizes that our ability to innovate, our ties to the world, and our economic prosperity depend on our capacity to welcome and assimilate immigrants. The Administration will continue its efforts to work with the U.S. Congress and affected communities toward this end.
It was this section that brought my attention to this document in the first place. Currently there is an all out effort being waged by the Obama administration to undermine and reduce the rights of the individual States. Our constitution gave the Federal Government very narrow powers and left much of the governing authority to the States. Since the end of the Civil War there has been a fundamental shift in this balance. The Federal government by legislation, court rulings and fiat administrative declaration, is in a power grab that, if left unchecked, will eventually lead to a complete collapse of the nation we now have. I do believe that this is the ultimate goal of the Globalist movement and our current president is in league with it.
Please take the time to read all of what is there. Study history and educate yourself. This is the only way that “WE The People” can hope to retain what is left of OUR CULTURE and rebuild the society that our forefathers fought and died to preserve.
This is an addendum to this post. It is a letter sent by Gov. Jan Brewer to Sec. Hillary Clinton in response to the inclusion of Arizona Immigration bill HB 1070 in this report.
Here is a link to the list of “member nations” for this council. Some real “himan Rights” champions there.
Tags: Barak Obama, Columnists, Elections, united nations




